Blog Archives - Page 8 of 10 - James Thornton Family Law

31 July 2024

The Intricacies of Financial Remedies in High-Profile Cases – A Look at Goodman v Walker [2024] EWFC 212

In the notable case of Goodman v Walker [2024] EWFC 212, the Family Court navigated the complex financial and personal dynamics following the separation of Lauryn Goodman and Kyle Walker, a Premier League footballer. This case offers rich insights into how financial remedies are structured in high-profile separations, particularly under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. Here, we delve into the judgment, its outcomes, and key points of interest.

Case Background

Parties Involved:

Applicant: Ms. Lauryn Goodman, a single mother with modest earnings.
Respondent: Mr. Kyle Walker, a professional footballer for Manchester City and the England national team.

Children:

Kairo (born April 17, 2020)
Kinara (born June 28, 2023)

Ms. Goodman sought financial remedies for their second child, Kinara, in addition to the existing provisions for Kairo.

Key Findings and Judgment

Financial Responsibilities and Support

Mr. Walker’s substantial income and public profile necessitated a careful consideration of financial support to ensure the welfare of both children. The court’s judgment mandated:

Housing Provisions: A property in a secure and appropriate location for Ms. Goodman and her children, with a more generous housing budget reflecting the family’s needs and public interest considerations.
Financial Maintenance: Ongoing financial support, including contributions towards the children’s savings and additional expenses related to their upbringing.

Legal Costs

The case incurred significant legal costs:

Ms. Goodman’s Costs: £259,298
Mr. Walker’s Costs: £171,440

Most of Ms. Goodman’s legal costs were covered by Mr. Walker, reflecting the disparity in their financial positions and ensuring she had adequate representation.

Public and Media Interest

Mr. Walker’s attempts to keep his paternity of Kinara confidential led to additional financial provisions, emphasising the court’s role in considering the broader implications of public interest and media coverage.

Points of Interest

High-Profile Litigation Dynamics

The case underscores the unique challenges in high-profile financial remedy proceedings. The involvement of a celebrity figure like Mr. Walker added layers of complexity, including managing public perception and media scrutiny.

Balancing Fairness and Conduct

The court balanced the need for fairness in financial support with the conduct of both parties. Mr. Walker’s initial secrecy regarding Kinara’s paternity and Ms. Goodman’s public statements influenced the court’s decisions, highlighting how behaviour during litigation can impact outcomes.

Ensuring Children's Welfare

A central focus of the judgment was the welfare of the children, ensuring they have a stable and secure living environment. The court’s emphasis on adequate housing and financial support reflects a broader commitment to the best interests of the children involved.

Extensive Legal Costs

The significant legal costs highlight the contentious nature of the proceedings and the strategic legal battles often seen in high-profile cases. Ensuring equitable access to legal representation was a key concern addressed by the court.

Analysis

The Goodman v Walker judgment provides a comprehensive look at how the Family Court handles financial remedy applications involving high-profile individuals. The decision to provide a secure and comfortable home for Ms. Goodman and her children, alongside substantial financial support, illustrates the court’s holistic approach to child welfare.

Furthermore, the case serves as a reminder of the potential financial and emotional costs of litigation. The extensive legal fees and strategic manoeuvres by both parties underscore the importance of seeking amicable resolutions where possible, particularly for the sake of the children involved.

In conclusion, Goodman v Walker [2024] EWFC 212 shows the interplay between financial obligations, public scrutiny, and personal conduct in family law. It highlights the Family Court’s commitment to ensuring fair outcomes, balancing the needs of the children with the financial realities and behaviour of the parents. It offers valuable lessons on the complexities and considerations in high-profile financial remedy proceedings.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: case law, footballer, kyle walker, schedule 1

30 July 2024

Claims against a Business on Divorce: BP v AP [2024] EWFC 206

In the recent case of BP v AP ([2024] EWFC 206), the Family Court in Oxford dealt with the complex financial remedies following the dissolution of a long marriage. This judgment highlights the intricate dynamics of dividing assets, particularly when business interests and allegations of misconduct are involved.

Background

Parties: BP (wife, 49) and AP (husband, 59) cohabited since 1998, married in 2002, and separated in 2017. They share three children: A (23), B (16), and C (14). BP also has an older son from a previous relationship, and AP has a daughter from another relationship.
Divorce Proceedings: The petition was filed in 2018, with the decree nisi obtained in 2019. The final hearing for financial remedies took place in April 2024.

Key Issues

Business Interests:
- Husband's Claim: AP argued that the business, primarily his content creation and influencer work, was his alone. He had established new companies post-separation, diverting income from the original business set up during the marriage.
- Wife's Claim: BP contended that the business was initially her idea and she had a significant role in its setup. She sought compensation for being excluded from the business profits and demanded a lump sum and transfer of the family home.
Financial Misconduct Allegations:
- BP accused AP of hiding true income and depriving her of rightful remuneration. She claimed AP's actions warranted financial compensation due to his misconduct during litigation.

Court Findings

Credibility of Evidence:
- The court found BP's narrative inconsistent with the documentary evidence. Her claims lacked credible support.
- Conversely, AP was deemed a reliable witness. His detailed disclosure of finances was corroborated by the evidence.
Financial Orders:
- The court decided against BP's extensive financial claims. Instead, it ruled in favour of a more balanced division:
  - BP would retain the family home, providing security for herself and the children.
  - AP would retain his business, allowing him to continue earning an income without the threat of further litigation.

Conclusion

This case underscores the complexities of financial remedy proceedings, especially when business interests are involved. It also illustrates the court's careful consideration of both parties' contributions and the necessity for credible evidence. This judgment balances the need for fair financial provision with the practical realities of each party's future earning potential and living arrangements.

For further details, refer to the full judgment: BP v AP (financial remedies - final hearing) [2024] EWFC 206.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: business, case law, law report

23 July 2024

Litigation Misconduct and the Court’s Quasi Inquisitorial approach: VS v OP [2024] EWFC 190

Background: In the case of VS v OP, the court was confronted with severe litigation misconduct, non-disclosure, and breaches of court orders by one of the parties. The husband, appearing as a litigant in person, faced numerous challenges, including the wife’s persistent failure to comply with disclosure requirements and non-attendance at hearings. This case highlights the court's quasi-inquisitorial approach in financial remedy proceedings.

Key Issues:

Litigation Misconduct and Non-Disclosure:
- The wife repeatedly failed to comply with court orders for disclosure.
- The husband, unable to afford representation, struggled to meet procedural requirements, including the preparation of a proper hearing bundle.
Court's Quasi-Inquisitorial Role:
- The court had to take an active role in investigating the issues due to the lack of compliance and full disclosure by the parties.
- The judge emphasised the need for fair outcomes, considering all relevant factors under s.25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, despite the procedural challenges.

Court's Findings:

Non-Disclosure and Inferences:
- Due to the wife's non-disclosure, the court had to draw reasonable inferences about the parties’ financial positions.
- The court avoided speculation and sought to base its findings on the available evidence, ensuring the inferences were properly drawn and justified.
Assets and Liabilities:
- The court assessed the visible assets and liabilities of both parties, considering the husband's disclosure and the limited information from the wife.
- Despite the wife's non-attendance and lack of disclosure, the court made findings on the net equity of properties, investments, and liabilities.
Procedural Challenges:
- The absence of a proper bundle and the fragmented nature of the documentation made it difficult for the court to get a clear picture of the case.
- The judge decided against adjourning the final hearing, given the low asset nature of the case and the improbability of the wife complying with future orders.

Conclusion: The judgment in VS v OP underscores the court's duty to ensure a fair resolution in financial remedy cases, even when faced with significant procedural non-compliance and misconduct by the parties. The quasi-inquisitorial approach adopted by the court aims to achieve justice by actively investigating and drawing reasonable inferences from the available evidence, ensuring that the parties’ conduct does not unduly prejudice the outcome.

The case illustrates the complexities and judicial responsibilities in managing financial remedy proceedings, particularly when one party engages in litigation misconduct and non-disclosure. The court’s ability to adapt and ensure a fair outcome, despite these challenges, is critical in maintaining the integrity of the legal process.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: case law, litigation misconduct, quasi inquisitorial, vs v op 2024 ewfc 190

22 July 2024

Armed Forces Pension Scheme 2015 Pension Remedy – Divorce Information Note

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) recently issued an essential information note regarding the 2015 Pension Remedy and its implications for divorce, particularly focusing on Pension Sharing Orders (PSOs). This update is crucial for members eligible for the 2015 Pension Remedy, providing clarity on how divorce and pension sharing will be managed under the new regulations.

Understanding the 2015 Pension Remedy

The 2015 Pension Remedy addresses the pension entitlements of Armed Forces members, particularly those who served between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2022. This period, referred to as "remediable service," is now subject to revised calculations and adjustments to ensure fairness and compliance with recent legal changes.

Key Highlights of the Update:

Divorce and Pension Sharing Orders:
- A PSO is a court order detailing how a pension is divided during divorce or the dissolution of a civil partnership.
- The court requires Cash Equivalent Values (CEVs) to determine the pension division, which reflects the value of the member's pension benefits.
Implementation of Pension Sharing Orders:
- The guidance to calculate and implement PSOs has been updated to comply with the new regulations.
- Various processes, including technical assessments and system updates, are necessary before the implementation can proceed.
Cash Equivalent Values (CEVs):
- Requests for CEVs from active and deferred members are now being processed, following the completion of the revised calculation methodology.
- Pensioner members who have made a remedy election and have their pension positions settled can also have their CEV requests processed.
Outstanding Guidance and Future Steps:
- Some guidance for specific scenarios, such as for pensioner members on Transfer Day and those who left service post-March 31, 2024, is still pending.
- The MOD is working diligently to complete the necessary updates and provide accurate calculations for all affected members.
Interim Measures and Communication:
- Until all processes are in place, interim measures will be adopted, such as issuing legacy benefits without applying pension debits to avoid delays in payments.
- The MOD will provide further updates as the guidance is reviewed and implemented, ensuring members are informed of their pension positions and any necessary adjustments.

Contact and Further Information

Members with questions or needing assistance can contact the Joint Personnel Administration Centre (JPAC) via the following email or phone numbers:

Joint Personnel Administration Centre (JPAC)
Mail Point 480
Kentigern House
65 Brown Street
Glasgow G2 8EX
Telephone: UK: 0800 085 3600
Outside UK: +44 141 224 3600)
Monday to Friday: 0700 – 1900
Email: dbs-pensionshelp@dbspv.mod.uk

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: 2015 pension remedy, armed forces, ministry of defence, mod, pension sharing order

19 July 2024

Preparing Your Case for Relocation of a Child – Top Tips

Relocating with a child can be a complex and emotionally charged process, especially if both parents do not agree on the move. Under the Children Act 1989, the primary concern is always the child's best interests. If you are considering a relocation and want to ensure a smooth legal process, here are some top tips to help you prepare your case effectively.

Understand the Legal Framework

Before diving into the details of your case, familiarise yourself with the Children Act 1989. Key provisions to understand include Specific Issue Orders and Child Arrangements Orders. Knowing the legal framework will help you navigate the process more confidently and ensure you meet all legal requirements.

Document Everything

Meticulous documentation is crucial. Keep detailed records of all communications with the other parent, including emails, texts, and letters. Maintain a log of significant events and interactions with your child that highlight your involvement and care. These records can be invaluable in court to demonstrate your commitment to your child's well-being.

Focus on the Child's Best Interests

The court's primary concern is the child's best interests. Prepare a comprehensive statement explaining why the relocation benefits your child. Address the child's emotional, educational, and social needs, and show how the move will positively impact these areas.

Gather Supporting Evidence

Collect documents and evidence to strengthen your case, such as:

- Details of the new home (lease agreement, photographs).

- Information about the new school (Ofsted reports, admission confirmation).

- Community amenities and support networks in the new area.

- Letters of support from teachers, doctors, or other professionals involved in your child's life.

Prepare a Detailed Relocation Plan

Outline a clear and practical relocation plan, including:

- Moving logistics and timeline.

- School transfer details and integration plans.

- Housing arrangements and stability.

- Proposals for maintaining your child's relationship with the non-relocating parent.

Consider the Impact on the Non-Moving Parent

Demonstrate how your child will maintain regular contact with the non-moving parent. Propose realistic and practical contact arrangements, such as extended holidays, weekend visits, and virtual communication (video calls).

Consider the Child's Views and Wishes

If appropriate, ascertain your child's views and wishes regarding the move. Ensure their voice is heard without putting undue pressure on them. The court may consider the child's preferences depending on their age and maturity.

Seek Mediation

Before resorting to court, consider mediation to resolve the dispute amicably. Mediation can lead to a mutually agreed plan and reduce the need for litigation. It's often less stressful and more cost-effective.

Consult a Family Law Solicitor

Seek legal advice from a solicitor specialising in family law. A solicitor can help you understand your rights, obligations, and the likelihood of success in your case. They can assist with drafting documents, preparing for court hearings, and representing you in court.

Prepare for the Court Hearing

Be ready to present your case clearly and convincingly. Practice your testimony and responses to potential questions from the judge and the other party. Stay calm and focused, emphasising the child's best interests throughout the proceedings.

Maintain Open Communication

Keep communication lines open with the other parent to show your willingness to cooperate and focus on your child's welfare. Avoid negative or hostile interactions that could be used against you in court.

Conclusion

Navigating the process of internal relocation with a child can be challenging, but thorough preparation and a focus on your child's best interests can make a significant difference. By understanding the legal framework, documenting everything, and presenting a well-prepared case, you can increase your chances of a successful outcome. Remember, the goal is to ensure the move benefits your child while maintaining a meaningful relationship with both parents.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: children, relocation, top tips

19 July 2024

Exploring Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Family Law: A Guide to Resolving Conflicts Amicably

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has emerged as a popular and effective approach to resolving conflicts outside of traditional litigation, particularly in family law cases. ADR methods such as mediation, collaborative law, and arbitration offer divorcing couples and families the opportunity to resolve disputes in a more collaborative, cost-effective, and timely manner. In this blog post, we’ll explore the various forms of ADR in family law and discuss the benefits and considerations of each.

Mediation: Mediation involves the assistance of a neutral third-party mediator who helps facilitate communication and negotiation between the parties to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. In family law mediation, couples work together to address issues such as child custody, visitation, property division, and spousal support. Mediation is often preferred for its flexibility, confidentiality, and ability to empower parties to make their own decisions.
Collaborative Law: Collaborative law is a cooperative approach to resolving family disputes that involves the parties, their attorneys, and other professionals (such as financial advisors or mental health professionals) working together in a series of meetings to reach a settlement agreement. Collaborative law emphasises open communication, transparency, and problem-solving, with the goal of reaching a mutually beneficial outcome for all involved.
Arbitration: Arbitration is a more formal ADR process in which an impartial arbitrator is appointed to hear the parties’ arguments and evidence and render a binding decision. Unlike mediation, arbitration resembles a mini-trial, with the arbitrator acting as a private judge who evaluates the case and issues a decision that is legally enforceable. Arbitration offers parties greater control over the process and can be faster and less expensive than traditional litigation.

Benefits of ADR in Family Law:

Promotes Cooperation: ADR encourages parties to work together to find solutions that meet their needs and priorities, fostering a cooperative and collaborative approach to conflict resolution.
Saves Time and Money: ADR methods are often faster and less expensive than traditional litigation, as they typically involve fewer court appearances, legal fees, and procedural delays.
Preserves Relationships: By promoting open communication and mutual respect, ADR helps preserve relationships between family members, particularly important in cases involving children or ongoing co-parenting relationships.
Empowers Parties: ADR empowers parties to take an active role in resolving their disputes and crafting solutions that are tailored to their unique circumstances and needs.

Considerations for ADR in Family Law:

Voluntary Participation: Participation in ADR is generally voluntary, meaning both parties must agree to participate in the process. However, in some cases, courts may require parties to attempt ADR before proceeding to litigation.
Confidentiality: ADR processes such as mediation and collaborative law are confidential, meaning discussions and negotiations that take place during these processes cannot be used as evidence in court.
Legal Representation: While parties in ADR are encouraged to seek legal advice, they may not always be represented by attorneys throughout the process. However, having legal guidance can help parties understand their rights, obligations, and the potential implications of any agreements reached.

In conclusion, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods offer divorcing couples and families a flexible, cost-effective, and collaborative approach to resolving conflicts in family law cases. Whether through mediation, collaborative law, or arbitration, ADR empowers parties to take control of the decision-making process, preserve relationships, and achieve mutually acceptable outcomes that prioritise the best interests of all involved.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: adr, alternative dispute resolution

19 July 2024

Prenuptial Agreements and Parental Loans in Divorce

Key Takeaways from ND v KD [2024] EWFC 188 (B)

Divorce proceedings often unravel intricate personal and financial histories, making each case unique. The recent judgment in ND v KD [2024] EWFC 188 (B) offers valuable insights into the legal handling of prenuptial agreements and parental loans. Here's what you need to know:

Prenuptial Agreements Under Scrutiny

In ND v KD, the prenuptial agreement (PNA) was a central issue. The court found the agreement to be invalid due to undue pressure exerted by the husband. Despite initial financial disclosures and legal advice received by the wife, the agreement was signed under significant emotional and logistical stress just days before the wedding. This case underscores the importance of ensuring that both parties enter into such agreements voluntarily and with a clear understanding of their implications.

Key Takeaway: For a prenuptial agreement to hold up in court, it must be entered into freely, without coercion, and must be fair to both parties.

Classifying Parental Loans

Another critical aspect of this case was the classification of parental loans. The husband received substantial financial support from his father, framed as loans for property development. The court determined these to be "soft loans," implying flexible repayment terms contingent on future financial success. Conversely, the wife's loans from her parents were more formally structured but also considered with an understanding of familial flexibility.

Key Takeaway: The nature of financial support from family members can significantly impact divorce settlements. Clear, formal agreements can help, but the court will also consider the realistic expectations of repayment and the overall context.

Ensuring Fair Settlements

The court's decision aimed to provide a fair outcome for the wife and child, considering the invalid PNA and the nature of the loans. The husband was ordered to provide substantial financial support, reflecting the court's commitment to equity and the well-being of the child involved.

Key Takeaway: Divorce settlements strive to balance fairness with practical considerations of need and future stability, especially when children are involved.

Final Thoughts

The ND v KD case is a reminder of the complexities involved in divorce proceedings and the meticulous attention courts pay to the fairness and voluntariness of agreements. For individuals considering or currently navigating a divorce, this case highlights the importance of transparent, fair agreements and the potential impact of family financial dynamics on settlements.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: parental loans, prenup, prenuptial agreements

19 July 2024

Navigating Drug and Alcohol Issues in Child Custody Cases: What You Need to Know

In child arrangement cases, the Family Court considers various factors to ensure the well-being of the child. Drug and alcohol issues can significantly impact the decisions made by the court, but understanding the legal landscape and proper preparation are essential for a favourable outcome.

Understanding the Legal Landscape

The term "custody" has been replaced with "child arrangements" in legal terminology.
Drug and alcohol abuse is taken seriously by the court, with the primary concern being the child's safety and protection from harm.

Impact of Drug and Alcohol Issues

A history of substance abuse may make it challenging to secure contact with a child but not impossible.
Supervised visits can be arranged to maintain the parent-child relationship, even in cases of ongoing substance abuse.
Building a strong case with the help of a specialised lawyer is crucial for achieving the desired outcome.

Factors Considered by the Court

The judge evaluates evidence to determine the extent of substance abuse and its impact on the child.
Current situation, home environment, and steps taken to address the issue are examined.
Type and severity of substance abuse, such as marijuana use versus heroin addiction, are weighed differently by the court.

Importance of Honesty and Integrity

Being honest with the court is not only a legal requirement but also advantageous for your case.
Lying about past issues can damage credibility and affect the court's perception of your reliability as a witness.

Court's Discretion and Best Interests of the Child

The court presumes that ongoing relationships with both parents are in the child's best interest.
In extreme cases where both parents are unfit due to substance abuse, alternative living arrangements may be considered, including foster care or placement with a family member.

Conclusion: Importance of Evidence and Legal Guidance

Resolving child arrangements amidst substance abuse challenges requires thorough preparation, honesty, and legal expertise. Understanding the court's considerations and presenting compelling evidence are vital for securing a favourable outcome that prioritises the child's well-being.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: alcohol, child arrangements, custody, drug

19 July 2024

Validity of Marriages Celebrated Abroad

When British couples marry abroad, the validity of their marriage is determined by the law of the country where the marriage took place. This principle, outlined in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, means that if the marriage is valid in the country where it occurred, it is considered valid everywhere else.

However, if there is uncertainty about the validity of the marriage, individuals may need to seek a Declaration of Marital Status under the Family Law Act 1996.

Declarations as to Marital Status

Under the Family Law Act 1996, individuals can apply to the High Court or a county court for various declarations regarding their marriage, including its validity, subsistence, or lack thereof. These declarations can also address the recognition of divorces, annulments, or legal separations obtained outside of England and Wales.

Obtaining a Divorce in England & Wales without a Marriage Certificate

To initiate divorce proceedings in England & Wales, the petitioner must submit their marriage certificate or a certified copy obtained from the Registrar. If the certificate is from a foreign country and not in English, a certified translation is necessary. In urgent cases where the certificate is unavailable, the petitioner may provide an undertaking to file it later.

Lost Marriage Certificate from Abroad

If the marriage certificate from a foreign country is lost, individuals should contact the Registrar or equivalent authority in that country to request a certified copy. It's crucial to have evidence of the marriage and ceremony's validity. In rare cases where obtaining a copy is impossible, the court may consider allowing proceedings without the original document, but legal advice is recommended.

Preparation and Advice

It's essential to keep the marriage certificate safe and accessible. Each country has its procedures for obtaining copies, often through government embassies or websites. When marrying abroad, using a recognised tour operator or planner can help maintain records and assist in obtaining copies if needed. Keeping electronic copies of important documents is also advisable in case physical copies are lost.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: marriage, overseas, validity

19 July 2024

Know Your Rights: A Guide for Unmarried Fathers

In England & Wales, unmarried fathers have legal rights and responsibilities regarding their children, but these rights may not be automatically granted like they are for married fathers. It’s important for unmarried fathers to understand their legal position and take steps to assert their parental rights. In this blog post, we’ll explore the legal rights of unmarried fathers, including paternity establishment and contact arrangements.

Establishing Paternity:

The first step for unmarried fathers to assert their parental rights is to establish paternity. If the child’s parents are not married at the time of birth, the father does not have automatic parental responsibility. However, paternity can be established by:

Being named on the child’s birth certificate: If the father’s name is included on the child’s birth certificate, he automatically has parental responsibility.
Voluntary acknowledgment of paternity: If the father’s name is not on the birth certificate, both parents can sign a parental responsibility agreement or a parental responsibility agreement.

Once paternity is established, the father has legal rights and responsibilities regarding the child.

Contact Arrangements:

Unmarried fathers have the right to seek contact with their child, but they may need to apply to the court for these rights if an agreement cannot be reached with the child’s other parent. When determining child arrangements, the court will consider the best interests of the child and may grant the father contact based on factors such as the father’s relationship with the child, stability, and ability to provide for the child’s needs. Before any court application can be made, the parties are obliged to attend mediation to try to resolve the matter amicably.

Child Support Obligations:

Unmarried fathers also have a legal obligation to financially support their children. If the child’s parents do not live together, the father may be required to pay child support to the child’s primary caregiver to help cover the child’s expenses.

In conclusion, unmarried fathers have legal rights and responsibilities regarding their children, including paternity establishment, contact, and child support obligations. By understanding their legal position and taking proactive steps to assert their parental rights, unmarried fathers can play an active and meaningful role in their children’s lives, promoting stability, support, and positive relationships for the benefit of the child.

Published by James Thornton in Blog

Tags: contact arrangements, fathers, fathers rights, parental responsibility, paternity, unmarried

‹ Newer Posts Older Posts ›

The Intricacies of Financial Remedies in High-Profile Cases – A Look at Goodman v Walker [2024] EWFC 212

Claims against a Business on Divorce: BP v AP [2024] EWFC 206

Litigation Misconduct and the Court’s Quasi Inquisitorial approach: VS v OP [2024] EWFC 190

Preparing Your Case for Relocation of a Child – Top Tips

Conclusion

Exploring Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Family Law: A Guide to Resolving Conflicts Amicably

Prenuptial Agreements and Parental Loans in Divorce

Key Takeaways from ND v KD [2024] EWFC 188 (B)

Navigating Drug and Alcohol Issues in Child Custody Cases: What You Need to Know

Validity of Marriages Celebrated Abroad

Know Your Rights: A Guide for Unmarried Fathers

Get in touch for your free consultation

Where innovation meets excellence

Information

York Office